ARGUMENT ANALYSIS Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

ARGUMENT ANALYSIS - Essay ExampleInitiall(a)y, Kamenetz rationalized that lawful sequence requirements must be flexible depending on circumstances, valid endeavors and supplemented with specifically identified requirements. As averred, legal bestride requirements should never stand alone. They should be flexible and pragmatic and paired with educational and cognitive requirements for the exercise of legal maturity (Kamenetz par. 4). Using cognitive faculties, the author progressed by using arranged appeals through citing credible modern-day practices. One of the valid supports presented legal regulations in driving. As disclosed, driving laws epitomized the best model for justifying that an early penchant to driving classes would result in more positive outcomes, especially in terms of lesser bootleg crashes. The statistics cited was sourced from the AAA Foundation for commerce Safety which conducted a study which revealed that the most restrictive of these programs are assoc iated with a 38 percent reduction in fatal crashes among the youngest drivers (Kamenetz par. 5). Using parallelism, the author expounded the early driving appropriate example to potentially include its application to voting through a proposed early voting permit. As suggested, a preliminary civics course could be used as a standard requirement for highly to qualify a young citizen to enforce the right to vote. The author further explored the applicability to empowering youngsters to expand the rights, non only to voting, but to include areas such as drinking, marriage, and responsible use of credit cards to debate financial obligations. The author indicated that in reality, this is already when most people have their first jobs, their first drinks and their sexual initiations. The law ought to empower young people to negotiate these transitions openly, not furtively (Kamenetz par. 7). However, the author failed to provide any counter-arguments to balance the proposed expansion of empowering teenagers to these activities. The strengths of the author in supporting the contentions lie in the effective selection of examples which were in effect backed by reliable sources. The essay was structured in a clear and logical style that flowed well. The tone was appropriate and formal to effectively manifest professionalism in treating the advocated lowering of voting age. There was no eminent oerly expressed intention to use emotional appeal and therefore, the strategy of using logical appeal enhanced the authors credibility in promoting the advocated cause. One noted weakness was the bankruptcy of the author to effectively reference the cited sources (such as the study published by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety). Moreover, there was a cited statistical figure at the concluding paragraph which was not appropriately cited Demographically, those over 85 are our fastest-growing group. By 2020, the entire nation will be about as silver-haired as Florida is to day (Kamenetz par. 11). These statements need citations to enable readers to verify their authenticity and reliability. Further, the concluding portion focused more on the threat or risks posed by the aging population that did not tie at all on the authors thesis statement. There was lack of expounding support for recommending young teenagers at the earliest age of 16 to vote by either providing advantages and also balancing the